wiki.millerjs.org

User Tools

Site Tools

ts590s

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
ts590s [2026/06/09 16:05] – [Oscillator Upgrade] admints590s [2026/06/11 15:24] (current) – [Oscillator Upgrade] admin
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Kenwood TS-590S ====== ====== Kenwood TS-590S ======
 Acquired 2026-06-06 at the Rockland Hamfest. Serial number ______. I do not yet know if the ALC repair was made.  Acquired 2026-06-06 at the Rockland Hamfest. Serial number ______. I do not yet know if the ALC repair was made. 
 +
 +==== IF Panadaptor Tap ====
 +Adding an panadaptor tap is one of my favorite things to do to HF rigs. I usually prefer IF taps to Rx taps, but on the TS-590S this is a challenge because the radio does both upconversion and downconversion, and there are two IF tap points. On Mark W7MLG's page on adding an SDR panadaptor to the TS-590S [[https://sites.google.com/site/marksts590smods/|here]], he mentions the availability of CN101 for an Rx tap before the RF amplifier, or CN201, which also makes use of the band pass filters. That's my preference, so I'll also be using CN201. 
 +
 +
 +Two examples: 
 +  - https://kd2c.com/hi-z-tap-boards
 +  - https://www.sdr-kits.net/Panoramic-Adaptor-Tap-Boards
 +
 +Other resources:
 +  - Mark W7MLG has a good page on an IF tap for the 590: [[https://sites.google.com/site/marksts590smods/|here]]
 +  - Good presentation SDR panadapters in general, with some TS-590 specifics: [[https://groups.io/g/TS-590/files/Generic%20TS-590/SDR%20based%20panadapters%20k3wyc%20rev%20-.pdf|here]] (note: he does an RF tap)
  
 ==== Oscillator Upgrade ==== ==== Oscillator Upgrade ====
Line 12: Line 24:
 Cheap SO-3 alternatives exist, but may be have suspect phase noise or other issues: Cheap SO-3 alternatives exist, but may be have suspect phase noise or other issues:
   * https://www.egloff.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48:ts590s-so-3-tcxo-replacement&lang=en   * https://www.egloff.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48:ts590s-so-3-tcxo-replacement&lang=en
 +
 +Potential DDS/PLL based alternatives?
 +  * SiTime [[https://www.sitime.com/products/mhz-oscillators/digitally-controlled-oscillators/sit3521|Si3521]] - this is not sold as a TCXO, but is a TCXO per its functional description. SiTime only states a stability of 20PPM, but I'm still interested in playing with one. The evaluation board is prohibitively expensive, so I may spin my own board if I wish to proceed further.
 +  * Jason Milldrum NT7S has done a lot of research, development, and testing into the application of a Silicon Labs [[https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/datasheets/Si5351.pdf|Si5351A]] coupled with a 25MHz TCXO. This is a $2 part that could be coupled with a $2 TCXO. With appropriate filtering this could be a strong contender, and there is already a baseline of using this combination in amateur radio projects that demand high stability. Lots of posts on his blog under "Si5351A" - https://nt7s.com/?s=Si5351A
 +  * The MS5351M exists as a Chinese clone of the Si5351A, and has been used favorably by QRP Labs, who also did a great write up on it. Interestingly, in his tests it demonstrated notably better phase noise characteristics than the Si5351A. Their write up can be found [[https://qrp-labs.com/synth/ms5351m.html|here]].
 +
 +=== Existing XO Analysis ===
 +
 ==== Photos ==== ==== Photos ====
  
ts590s.1781021114.txt.gz · Last modified: by admin
Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki